News:

Welcome to the Tormek Community. If you previously registered for the discussion board but had not made any posts, your membership may have been purged. Secure your membership in this community by joining in the conversations.
www.tormek.com

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Ken S

#8056
You're welcome, Mike.  I hope more of the forum will enjoy this video.  What beautiful, skillful turning.  And, Sam Maloof's chairs are hard to beat!

Ken
#8057
I enjoyed this, and thought the forum would, also.  The program includes an interview with President Carter and wood turning.

http://thehighlandwoodworker.com/?et_mid=581752&rid=5728235

Ken
#8058
Wood Turning / Re: 1 day old Tormek, should I bin it?
September 19, 2012, 03:37:30 AM
Learning to use a Tormek reminds me of something Ernie Conover said in his hand cut dovetail class.  As part of the class we all made Shaker candle boxes with hand cut through dovetails.  Needless to say, the dovetails in our first attempt were less than perfect.  Ernie suggested making fifteen candle boxes.  He assured us that if we worked carefully, by the fifteenth box, we would be proficient.

Instead of several days with the Tormek, buy it with the idea of trying it diligently for a year.  If after a year of steady use it doesn't seem to measure up, put it up on ebay and move on.  The year should eliminate operator error, or at least operator inexperience.

I don't expect the tormek to be my only piece of sharpening equipment.  I recently removed decades old head mushrooming from a couple splitting wedges.  I used my dry grinder with a Norton 3X 46 grit wheel. I am not convinced the Tormek can do a better job with the final stages of chisel back flattening and polishing than my water stones.  In fact, i'm not sure the leather honing wheel can match the 8000 water stone. (I admit this may be partially operator inexperience with the honing wheel)

I am convinced the Tormek can do many sharpening operations with far more precision and repeatability  than I can do by hand, and with much less strain on my hands. 

I recently started using the DBS-22 drill sharpening jig.  I was surprised how well the first bit turned out.  Not perfect, but far superior to what I could have done by hand. It came as no surprise that the next couple of bits were sharpened better than the first.  As I learn the routine and work diligently, my frill bit sharpening skills are growing.  Bit number three was very good.  Bit number 53 will be on target.

You are off to a good start, Tom.

Good points, Rhino.

Ken
#8059
Rhino, I'm glad you finally realized you need a drill sharpening jig to sharpen your cleaver.  Maybe I'll tune up my faithful cleaver.  I use it for both red and green cabbage.  Would you recommend two different holes, and what sizes? :)

Ken
#8060
This is getting very interesting.  Very good posts, Mike and Robin.

I don't believe the Tormek was originally designed to be a precision tool.  By that I mean to work within acceptable tolerances to a machinist or tool and die maker.  That is nothing negative against the Tormek.  If is was designed that way, it would probably cost $6000 or much more instead of $600.  It does provide a high level of repeatability and accuracy at a reasonable price.

That stated, I don't think the original idea foresaw the versatility the Tormek has today.  Ten years ago, while chugging along nicely sharpening knives, chisels and plane blades very well, who would have imagined being able to customize four facet edges on drill bits, let alone retouching carbide bits?  Who would have imagined interchangeable grinding wheels?

My workaday  bench planes are century old Stanley Bedrocks I have owned for forty years.  They have served me well, and I would not trade them for new Lie-Nielsen or Veritas planes.  Are the old Bedrocks the equal of today's premium planes?  Certainly not.  However, with skill and some fine tuning they can get very close.

I believe that, like the old Bedrocks and Baileys, the Tormek can get closer to the precision of an industrial grinder.  Skill and experience are certainly the main ingredients.  Jeff is certainly the example of that.  there is no substitute for years of day in, day out using the tools.  I have no doubt that Jeff is continually honing his skills and not just going through the motions.  (Read the "sweet spot" post in wheel alignment.)

We can all work on "operator error on inexperience".  We would do well to also think like machinists.  We certainly don't need lab accuracy granite surface plates.  We would be very well served by a good "B" grade small surface plate. (B grade is typically used on the machine shop floor for workaday tasks.)  I agree with Mike about Starrett quality.  If you have not used a Starrett Satin Chrome rule, you don't know what a fine rule can do.  Buy a six inch Satin Chrome 3R graduated rule with end gradations.  You will use it all the time and love it.

Back to Tormek.  I think Mike's idea of tuning the surface of the SE-76 is a very solid improvement.  How much of an improvement?  I don't know, but within the area of worthwhile.  Add it to careful dressing of the wheel and checking the alignment of the Universal Support Bar and we are getting closer to a precision tool.  Truing the front surface is a one time operation, like flattening and polishing the back of a chisel.  It takes time and patience to do it well.  It will make a better tool for the life of the tool.

Will future Tormek SE-76 jigs come from the factory with ground edges?  Possibly.  The second T7 I purchased came with the new EZYlock shaft and water trough.  My first unit came with a regular shaft, but made of stainless steel, an upgrade.  The SE-76 itself is an upgraded jig.

I know from personal experience that this forum is read by people at Tormek AB in Sweden. I hope the engineering staff have either considered grinding the front surface in the past, or will consider it.  If they feel it would be a cost effective improvement, they will probably introduce it.  It would be very nice if they posted their thoughts.

If they choose not to grind the surface, it does not mean it is not a good idea.  I think my idea of a half size flat surface jig is a definite improvement for very small blades.  I also realize that the demand for it would not be enough to justify the cost of manufacturing it as a separate product.  Any business must consider the bottom line or perish.

Robin and Mike, keep up the good work.  We can all benefit.

Ken 
#8061
Excellent post, Mike.  Good thoughts and photos well done.  I'll need some time to think it through.

Ken
#8062
Clever, Herman.  I wouldn't have thought of just using a thread die on the support rod and buying a nut. 

Ken
#8063
Rhino,

Robincbailey posted the idea for the larger universal support bar and found a local machine shop who would make them. Here is a link to the post:

http://forum.tormek.com/index.php?topic=1027.msg2642#msg2642

He offered them to the forum, however, received only one request (from me).

I thought Robin had a good idea and followed through well with it.  I was disappointed that no other forum members  supported him. 

I bought a spare US-105.  Ernie Conover did a DVD on using the Tormek which showed the second US-105 mounted on his Tormek.  (one in vertical position for grinding; the other in horizontal for stropping with the leather wheel)  I have since concluded that handheld stropping is more practical. 

I also bought a spare mount for the US-105.  Mine was an older model which had only one locking screw.  In hindsight, I wish I had bought the newer model with two locking screws.

Both your idea and Robin's have good points.  There is room in the Tormek universe for both.  I would use your idea if I had occasional work.  If I was regularly sharpening cleavers professionally, I would welcome Robin's jig.

Ionut and I posted design suggestions for  jigs for small knives.  Ionut made up a prototype and posted the photographs.  Among my spare Tormek parts is a second SVD-110.  My plan is to cut it in half.  In half size it would allow small knife blades to be sharpened from either side of the wheel.  Tormek makes no such jig.

We have some clever and well trained people on this forum.  The Tormek has potential beyond the jigs the company presently manufactures.  Since I purchased my first Tormek, the company has added two new grinding wheels; a fine drill bit jig; and upgraded the water trough and shaft.  This is commendable, and I hope it will continue.  I hope a variable camber plane blade jig is in the pipeline.

As Tormek users, we can be innovative as well.  We need more innovative people like Ionut and you, Rhino, on the forum.

Keep up the good work and keep the ideas coming.

Ken
#8064
Clever solution, Rhino.

Ken
#8065
Planer Blade Sharpening / Re: 4" JOINTER BLADES
September 06, 2012, 10:08:42 AM
Ralph,
Straight is the only way to go with jointer blades.  My thought was only to run a board through with the arch before regrinding the blades.  Like you, I have a four inch jointer.  If you use hand planes to joint the odd wider board, the concave board might help keep the cambered plane blade honed.  Two feet of board would be plenty for the project.

Ken
#8066
Planer Blade Sharpening / Re: 4" JOINTER BLADES
September 06, 2012, 03:44:52 AM
Ralph,

I hesitated to reply because my plans to sharpen my jointer blades  were upstaged by my local repairman.  He changed out the jointer bearings for me and, unbeknownst to me, also had the blades sharpened.

Anyway, if the arched effect is uniform in your blades, you might run a couple boards through your jointer.  The slight concavity might be the right shape for honing hand plane blades with camber.  Either glue some high tech fine abrasive or use some diamond paste.

Ken
#8067
Hand Tool Woodworking / Re: Hand Saw Sharpening
September 06, 2012, 02:18:03 AM
Robin, i seem to recall you live in the UK.  Correct?  If so, you might want to contact David Charlesworth.  He is a former member (though not very active) of this forum.  His technique seems first-rate.  He might recommend a good sharpening service in the UK.

Keep us posted.

Ken
#8068
Drill Bit Sharpening / Re: DBS-22 thoughts
September 03, 2012, 04:10:34 AM
Gary,

I really believe one of the engineering precepts of the Tormek system is that it work using the standard grinding wheel.  The SB and SJ wheels expand the range, but the heart of the system is the SG.

You should tell your wife that I convinced you that you didn't need the SB immediately to have the DBS-22 work, thus saving almost two hundred dollars.  If your wife is as smart as mine is, she probably won't fall for that, but may be nice enough to play along.

Good luck.

Ken
#8069
General Tormek Questions / Re: Cracked grinding wheel
September 02, 2012, 08:07:38 PM
I sharpened a 7/16" hss bit earlier today.  I switched back to the standard grinding wheel.  I really didn't notice any difference between the black wheel and the general wheel.  I might feel differently if I had a lot of bits to sharpen or, more probably, if I was sharpening carbide or other exotic bits.

With the 7/16" hss bit, if I wanted to touch up bits like this and had the regular wheel mounted on the Tormek, I don't think I would change wheels, even with the EZYlock.  So, Gary, I would not let not having the black wheel hold you back.

Ken
#8070
I'm glad I'm not the only one who uses scrapers for less than pristine uses.  They are certainly useful tools.

For what it's worth, I'm a fan of both Lie-Nielsen and Lee Valley.  Both are top quality makers.  I generally prefer traditionally designed tools.  Lie-Nielsen leans that way.  Lee Valley is more innovative in its designing.

My only Lie-Nielsen tools are three bevel chisels (the /16 sizes).  They ooze quality.  (I think Lee Valley's recent chisel offerings can give them a run for the money.)

I have been a Lee Valley customer for many years.  They have never disappointed me.  I have one of their planes, the plow plane.  It is a real stand out tool, even before they added the versatility of the newer blades.  It leaves the venerable Stanley 45 in the dust.

Choosing between these two brands is really personal preference on a tool by tool basis. It is a win-win choice.

For a jack plane, I actually have three.  All are old Stanleys, the oldest being inherited from my grandfather.  It is from the 1890s.  The middle is a 1909 Bedrock.  The new kid, is from 1926.  All are fine tools.  While I appreciate the quality of LV and L-N, I have no desire to replace my old trooper jack planes.  (No, no one "needs" three jack planes.)

My suggestion for a "mess around with" jack plane would be to first buy Chris Schwarz' Handplane book and than find a prewar Stanley in good condition. Ernie Conover's out of print handplane VHS is worthwhile, also.  Your local library might be able to find a copy for you.   They are very plentiful and quite reasonably priced.  The book will pay for itself in helping you make a good choice and tuning the plane.  Tuning a plane is not difficult, and the skill will serve you well.  It can be fun, too.

Ken