News:

Welcome to the Tormek Community. If you previously registered for the discussion board but had not made any posts, your membership may have been purged. Secure your membership in this community by joining in the conversations.
www.tormek.com

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - tgbto

#1
The smaller honing wheel prevents it from getting in the way when sharpening long knives. Else the handle or heel of the knife may interfere with the honing wheel.
#2
If that's of any help to you, the "Top-of-USB to wheel" distance depends on wheel size and projection distance only. It doesn't change with the position of the MB-102.
#3
That sounds good. Just make sure during the third step of your workflow that you find a way to account for hysteresis.

You could check if you made a good job of it by changing the setup of the KS-123, then reproduce the settings you just noted down, see if a new sharpie layer is properly removed.

Cheers,

Nick.
#4
Quote from: Ken S on February 10, 2025, 06:59:58 PMWe are missing two important pieces of data:
1) the tolerance range for bevel angles in various applications.
2) the accuracy tolerance of our measuring tools (both the KS-123 and the calipers)

Right but... even cheap calipers such as those won't have an accuracy below .25mm. Which around 15 dps translates in a .2 dps accuracy. So whatever your tolerance on the result, you will get closer to it with a more accurate measurement principle.

Plus, whatever their accuracy, if you always use the same calipers, the end result will be more repeatable than with a tool with a rather wide, flexible needle, and noticeable hysteresis. Which in our world translates in less time to raise a burr.
#5
Hello,

[TL/DR: Use a calculator and calipers if you want the most precise way of setting an angle]

The intrinsic flaw in using the AngleMaster for knives is described at length in posts such as this one or this other one. The design of the WM-200 offsets the measurement by exactly half the total taper angle of the blade. This is a systematic error that cannot be reduced by training, not by increasing measurement precision of wheel diameter, etc.

The KS-123 is based on a design that allows to measure directly the angle between the tangent to the stone at the point where the apex will sit and the axis of the sharpening jig (which coincides reasonably well with the plane of symmetry of the blade when using the KJ). So no such skew here.

Precision is a different matter. It can come from many things, from the size of the needle on the KS-123 to whether or not you put a light in just the right place when you use the AngleMaster, but also what tolerances cumulate in the construction of the devices, how reproducible the manufacturing process is, etc. etc. To have a substantiated answer to "how precise is the KS-123 ?", you'd need to get a statistically significant sample of jigs, and not only a goniometer but also a consistent way of setting up the tool before you take your measurement. Not sure it's going to happen.

My gut feeling is that the KS-123 has a precision of around 1dps when setting an angle, and probably a fraction of that when reproducing an angle that has been ground using the KS-123 in the first place if your setup process is consistent. In my opinion, the biggest source of error in using the KS-123 comes from the hysteresis/backlash due to the friction between the black plastic part and the metal body and the flexibility oof the plastic needle. It can be reduced with a tad of silicon grease, and consistency can be improved by always approaching the target angle from below by raising the support bar.

Using a calculator rids you of many of these imprecisions. Calipers can be adjusted precisely with very little hysteresis, and the values you use are large enough that a little error will only have a small impact on the result. Much smaller than if you sum the width of the needle with the typical hysteresis of the KS-123.
#6
Quote from: RickKrung on February 07, 2025, 02:03:27 AM
Quote from: John_B on February 06, 2025, 08:57:33 PMAfter you use the angle setter you mat want to try coloring the knife edge with marker and rotate wheel ny hand to see what is removed. This is a double check on the setting.

I ALWAYS do this, no matter how I set the angle.  On EVERY blade.  On EVERY wheel diameter change (and even between Tormek diamond wheel changes where the diameter doesn't change). 

Yes, that. It is a tremendous help when it comes to gauging what the motion has to be to sharpen the tip (and heel) properly.
#7
I haven't tried yet, but maybe it's possible to setup the MFB in such a way that you could somehow use the truing tool on the side, at least between the outer edge and a minimum radius ?
#8
Knife Sharpening / Re: Tormek Honing Wheel Use
February 06, 2025, 08:17:35 AM
I have done so for a time, but found it inferior to using a fine ceramics rod with an angle guide. This gives me the longest time between actual grinding sessions.
#9
John, from everything we've seen on this forum, Tormek support is top notch. They may be a bit understaffed at times, but they're always professional and careful about their reputation as a premium supplier. You're not taking any real risks here. And this way you'll keep your (long) warranty.
#10
Knife Sharpening / Re: Rock Hard Felt Wheels
January 27, 2025, 08:54:03 AM
I don't have a lot of experience with my rock hard felt wheel. However, having sharpened maybe 20 knives on it, I find I have good results (ie 20 BESS higher) results with hard steels (63+ HRC). With standard steels, I'm actually worsening my BESS scores.

I probably don't use it right, but now I'm more after edge retention than initial sharpness.
#11
General Tormek Questions / Re: Honing wheel
January 16, 2025, 04:12:11 PM
If it is just a scratch, I would not really bother doing anything other than using it properly, edge trailing. A small bump won't be an issue, and will get smoothed out overtime.

If there is a bit of leather that has been cut and stays raised, i'd carefully trim that off, removing as little as possible so whatever is left of the scratch gets pressed down when honing, rather than lifted and folded backwards.

#12
Knife Sharpening / Re: Nicks
January 15, 2025, 08:25:58 AM
Also Wootz was dedicating a lot of effort to getting the lowest BESS scores, which is an indication of how thin the apex of the edge is. But this result can be altered by sheer oxidation, not to mention a few cuts of hard vegetables on a wooden board. In his book, there is a chapter about edge retention which is not really dependent on initial sharpness but rather on apex angle.

That being said, I concur with John in making an intermediate check before honing to get a good look at the edge. The burr should be visible, but its root should be clean. If nicks appear when honing with only leather wheel and PA-70, I'm clueless. And I wouldn't use a rock hard wheel before I get satisfactory results with the leather wheel. That would eliminate a possible culprit in addition to providing a sound comparison basis.

@mrducks, do you sharpen edge leading or edge trailing ? Do you use a lot of pressure when honing ?
#13
Knife Sharpening / Re: centering with SVM jigs
January 06, 2025, 11:12:01 AM
Hello Steve,

This overgrind in the middle is common with a lot of knife sharpening setups where you can easily spend more time sharpening the middle section than the heel and tip. It is especially pronounced on the Tormek which removes metal fast (the downside of fast sharpening). You will have to learn to focus on spending more time/pressure in those area that see the stone less often.

Do you sharpen going back and forth, or only from heel to tip ?

Also, rounding out the shoulders of the stone helps a lot.

Lastly, it is important to care about the way you lay down your knife: make sure it is not tilted towards the tip when you approach the stone. For safety's sake, I prefer to tilt it ever so slightly towards the heel.

Cheers,

Nick.
#14
I own the KS-123, and end up more often than not using a software-based solution, even when sharpening a single or few knives at a time.

There is some friction in the KS-123 that, coupled with the flexibility of the plastic needle indicating the sharpening angle, makes for a 1 dps-ish precision. And despite the fact that Tormek wrote in their KS-123 patent that "There may be errors in computation-based solutions", I find the calculator-based process to be much more repeatable, resulting in a burr being raised in just a couple of strokes on the ungraded SG. This also minimizes the amount of metal removed, increasing the lifetime of knives (or at least the time before requiring thinning).

Also, once you get the hang of it - and , granted, with a bit of hardware for quick projection distance measuring/setting - I'm not sure the KS-123 setup is a lot faster.

All in all, I think the KS-123 has the advantage of being a reasonably accurate, self-contained solution, but calculators and calipers (and an adjustable projection distance) make for a more efficient process overall.
#15
So this is actually a thing, even though not a Tormek thing...

Still, there are two fundamental issues with such wheels :
- If the wheel is noticeably wider than the serrations of the knife (as seems to be the case in the pictures on their website), then the result will be rounded out teeth and untouched "valleys". If the wheel is noticeably narrower than the serrations, it will be fragile *and* will cut aggressively.
- How do you restore them when they wear down ? I guess one could use diamond plates and aim for a triangular shape, but it will be fidgety.

IMO, a thin triangular or cylindrical rod used either freehand or on an edgepro-like system will make for a much more controlled process and repeatable results. Along with a flat benchstone for the backside.