Messages

If you're sharepning a knife with a thick blade, you might be reprofiling it even if the sharpie test comes out okayish. So you'll have to remove a lot of material before consistently hitting the APEX, which the T1 is not good at. It may require thinning the knife with a more suitable device beforehand. This is compounded with hard steels.

The belt grinder will always come in handy when you will want to regrind the bolsters of the german knives (I assume they do have a bolster guard like many Wusthofs/Zwillings/...). Bolsters are a PITA, whatever the sharpening system, if we want to keep a sharp knife for generations.

The T1 should do a good job of keeping those sharp as long as it is used for short, frequent sessions. I'd say a couple passes on each side and a thorough honing on a slightly wet composite wheel.

Hi Adrian, and welcome to the Forum.

TL/DR: The T1 is only for quick touchups of western-bladed, no-too-dull knives.

Uncut (^^) version :

Although the T1 has a diamond stone, it is not intended for heavy reprofiling. Forum members usually follow a couple different methods on T4/T8-type machines : either grade the stone very coarse or use it just after truing, ore use after-market ultra-low-grit CBN wheels, or even Norton coarse bench grinder wheels. Those are not options for the T1, and only the last two will work on super steels.
For heavy reprofiling, many members use belt grinders for heavy-duty work, then finish up on the Tormek.

So the T1 being slow is normal, especially on super steels which will wear down more slowly than standard steels. Also keep in mind that super steels can form a very tiny - yet quite hard - burr. These need to be honed thoroughly, and this will again take longer than standard steels.

I don't own a T1, but regarding your single-beveled knives :
- Yanagibas, like usubas, takohikis and debas are those thick,single-beveled, japanese kitchen knives (also called wa-bocho, wa standing for Japan). They cannot be sharpened on a T1 (not on any other Tormek for that matter) as it will ruin the grind. The bevel is flat/very-slightly convex and the Tormek will make it concave. The bevel is to be sharpened along its entire height and the Tormek will only sharpen a tiny bit at a time. The hollow, u-shaped back (ura) is to be sharpened flat so the top and bottom get equally sharpened. And I won't even talk about what happens at the tip (kissaki). Thoses knives must be sharpened on flat media, preferably the traditional way : using flat benchstones. So if your knife actually is a yanagiba, keep away from the T1.
- If by yanagiba you actually meant a sujihiki (also called laser), this is a western-bladed japanese knife (also called "yo-bocho"). There should therefore be no problem sharpening it on a Tormek, and if it is highly assymetrical as sometimes is the case, then sharpen it very assymetrically, but I'm not sure it applies for your knife.

Also a common problem with Tormeks (it is a bit different though on T1/T2 compared to T4/T8) is having trouble with bolsters.
Depending on the shape of the bolster/handle, it may not be doable to sharpen a knife close to the handle. Victorinox swibos are infamously known for this : as the handle is made of plastic, the only way you can sharpen it close to the handle is by heavily (and messily) grinding the plastic away.
This is especially true for
this kind of knife which, if you look closely is not factory sharpened close to the handle. However, as you sharpen it on a Tormek, you will create a dent at that point where you can no longer get closer to the handle, and this will be an issue for some cuts. Again, a belt grinder is the solution.

I cannot talk to chinese cleavers on a T1 as I own neither. Hope this helps !

 

I would try sharpening one knife using a distance-based angle setting method, then checking it with the laser goniometer, so you can actually incriminate the KS-123 or put the blame on your goniometer.

Also, have you tried lubricating the surface where the black plastic scale contacts the metal body of the KS-123 ? This helps reduce hysteresis.

I agree with the PETG suggestion. There are even some not-so-expensive low-friction ones.

I was not really afraid of having to print additional ones (I usually print a couple anyway, just in case). I was rather thinking of tiny plastic particles getting inside the bearings...

Rick, it's a nice idea. My first thought was "let's print it with a Igus filament", although buying a roll just for one washer may slightly impair the financial equation

Quick question : Aren't your concerned with the plastic washer wearing down with time ?

A question though : I just watched the video on Tormek website on the TS page. The hooks seem to use two squares each on the side of the TS, and there's a quarter turn knob in the lower square that seems to lock the hook in place ?!?!

Hello, and welcome.

I can't speak to the TS-740 as I don't own one. Still, I don't like the idea of overhanging stones very much, I'd hate to bump into one.

Regarding spillage, I'll risk two opinions :
1. Spillage is drastically reduced as you get more experience on your Tormek. Even with long knives, I hardly ever spill water on the machine or even the water collection plate anymore.
2. There are numerous 3D-printed options for drip collection, depending on whether or not you use a MB-102/FVB, etc. You can have a look at this one or this one for instance.

Enjoy your sharpening journey !

Salut,

Il faut peut être nettoyer plus souvent (en ôtant l'aimant et en suivant les consignes du manuel) pour éviter les accumulations de particules de métal.

Pour les lames fragiles, il est recommandé de mettre un peu de scotch de peintre (je recommande le 3M bleu) pour protéger la surface.

English summary : clean the protection pads often, protect delicate blades with blue painter's tape.

Any updates on the answer from Tormek support ?

You may want to look at this thread , or this one, this one, this one, and this one. 

One use will scoot that Bess number over or very close to 100.  It is doable and rewarding once you're there, but not practical for everyday use...IMHO

My experience as well. Nowadays I only use my BESS tester for very high end knives or knives I have never sharpened and am not sure what the feel is when they're sharp. For all others, the sound and feel of slicing through paper is enough. Even more than sharpness, it helps test for consistency along the edge.

Thanks for the very detailed answer, it makes a lot of sense !

I simply lock the knife in the jig, set a fixed projection length (like 138 mm from the clamp to the arch), and adjust the support height until the felt wheel perfectly matches the serration angle. Then I just guide the knife smoothly across the wheel.

I have no experience with diamond-loaded felt, so I will defer to those who have. IMO, as long as you slightly grind the edge you're good. However, I'd be careful with guiding "the knife smoothly over the wheel" as you risk rounding out the tips of the serrations. Also, if your grinding is efficient, you *will* get a burr on the backside, that you will have to remove somehow, and honing the frontside will not be sufficient : you will most likely get a foil-like burr.

[EDIT] Have you seen this post about serrated knives ? [/EDIT]

hi

Surface polishing and deburring can be done using 80-120 grit sanders

Yet another commercial post that only adds confusion. Those are becoming more frequent.

You have to grind the serrations before you hone or else you'll just have polished, blunt serrations. The Tormek technique for grinding serrations is freehand on the rounded shoulders of the grinding wheel. Some suggest to grind the backside with the side of the wheel, others to just hone the backside.

As for me, I prefer to clamp the knife in a vise or any holder, work on the serrations with a round ceramic rod, then use a few light passes of a very fine diamond plate for the backside.

The Tormek method is too much trouble IMO for serrated knives, and it is easy to grind way too much, or to inadvertently change the shape of the serrations.