It may be that this is the result of the T1 being a constant angle sharpener : as you near the apex, the grinding angle remains constant while the blade geometry usually changes (the most common is : it gets thicker behind the edge). Santokus should be less prone to this issue than standard, upward-curving european chef knives.
Usually, to maintain a constant bevel at the tip, such knives are sharpened at a higher angle near the tip. This way, the bevel width remains constant. Constant angle sharpeners will maintain a constant angle, so you will need to remove more material to get to the apex. Said otherwise, you will have to sharpen the shoulders of the bevel first, before you gradually move down to the apex.
You can confirm that hypothesis with the sharpie : apply it in such a manner that is extends beyond the edge onto the blade, and watch carefully after a full pass : if the ink is removed right where the bevel meets the flat of the blade, you have your answer. And with a constant angle sharpener there is just one way to do it : keep on grinding. Your bevel will widen but there is no alternative.
Usually, to maintain a constant bevel at the tip, such knives are sharpened at a higher angle near the tip. This way, the bevel width remains constant. Constant angle sharpeners will maintain a constant angle, so you will need to remove more material to get to the apex. Said otherwise, you will have to sharpen the shoulders of the bevel first, before you gradually move down to the apex.
You can confirm that hypothesis with the sharpie : apply it in such a manner that is extends beyond the edge onto the blade, and watch carefully after a full pass : if the ink is removed right where the bevel meets the flat of the blade, you have your answer. And with a constant angle sharpener there is just one way to do it : keep on grinding. Your bevel will widen but there is no alternative.
