I agree with you Ken. Different ways to reach a sufficiently good result must be good. I think Sir A has several good and wise points as well. And sometimes I think it's good to fall down a rabbit hole to learn. Sometimes I joke and call it a mess tester when people want to compete in "Bess" it looks like a deep rabbit hole at the end. Sorry for the bad English but it's a joke!
Cbwx has a good point of view with "wouldn't you get the same result if you didn't adjust for this error?" If you always measure with a small error, the result will always also have the same small error. This can become perfectly acceptable if you continue to "measure wrong" over time and accept the small error.
I think Ken agrees with this. -If you want useful results from measurements, you have to measure with the same technique every time, it is the difference between the measurement results that is most important. do not change the measurement method, you will soon not know what the results mean.
I very much appreciate your answers and that you challenge and develop issues with your experiences. Thanks
My problem is probably that I like rabbit holes! Maybe I'm a little crazy. Or much!
As an old retired engineer with long experience from manufacturing tools, jigs and prototypes, I have a built-in interest in solving problems and taking on every challenge. Sharpening knives, drills and similar tools is now my hobby but I enjoy just as much solving any problem I come across and trying to make a tool or jig for it.
And now I may have fallen down a new rabbit hole. An old friend of mine, very good knife sharpener, came to me and asked if I could build him a simple jig to set his knife angles but without having to use calculators or measure wheel sizes, usb height or other measurements. He doesn't use computers or smartphones that much and is quite analog. But he has discovered a need to be able to know what angle he is grinding with and to be able to set a specific angle. And he is not comfortable with Tormek's anglemaster on knives.
Has anyone of you worked with the same "rabbit hole" sorry! and maybe have ideas about solutions.
I have come a little way and am in the process of testing a prototype that can handle an accuracy of approx. 0.5 degrees right now.
Cbwx has a good point of view with "wouldn't you get the same result if you didn't adjust for this error?" If you always measure with a small error, the result will always also have the same small error. This can become perfectly acceptable if you continue to "measure wrong" over time and accept the small error.
I think Ken agrees with this. -If you want useful results from measurements, you have to measure with the same technique every time, it is the difference between the measurement results that is most important. do not change the measurement method, you will soon not know what the results mean.
I very much appreciate your answers and that you challenge and develop issues with your experiences. Thanks
My problem is probably that I like rabbit holes! Maybe I'm a little crazy. Or much!
As an old retired engineer with long experience from manufacturing tools, jigs and prototypes, I have a built-in interest in solving problems and taking on every challenge. Sharpening knives, drills and similar tools is now my hobby but I enjoy just as much solving any problem I come across and trying to make a tool or jig for it.
And now I may have fallen down a new rabbit hole. An old friend of mine, very good knife sharpener, came to me and asked if I could build him a simple jig to set his knife angles but without having to use calculators or measure wheel sizes, usb height or other measurements. He doesn't use computers or smartphones that much and is quite analog. But he has discovered a need to be able to know what angle he is grinding with and to be able to set a specific angle. And he is not comfortable with Tormek's anglemaster on knives.
Has anyone of you worked with the same "rabbit hole" sorry! and maybe have ideas about solutions.
I have come a little way and am in the process of testing a prototype that can handle an accuracy of approx. 0.5 degrees right now.