News:

Welcome to the Tormek Community. If you previously registered for the discussion board but had not made any posts, your membership may have been purged. Secure your membership in this community by joining in the conversations.
www.tormek.com

Main Menu

grinding angle software

Started by JCB, June 16, 2025, 03:33:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

JCB

Has anyone used the grinding angle software, measuring tool for jig projection  and FVB from SlipaKniven
Kind Regards
JCB

tgbto

I didn't, and I am not sure what their "proprietary software" would bring over those in @cbwx34's signature, or TormekCalc.

Why anyone would pay 20 EUR to use software that just replicates basic geometrical considerations (see this geogebra sketch ) is beyond me.

JCB

It was offered free with their FVB

tgbto

In that cas it will probably have constant measurements hardcoded into the software. So, hey, why not. But I'd rather use tested tools such as those mentioned above.

ABall

Hi, Ive been away from the forum for a long time so please forgive my question if its stupid. Doesnt the KS-123 jig do away with calculations? I know this is an old thread but its the first one that caught my eye on logging back in, I need to catch up.

John_B

The KS-123 does greatly reduce the need for calculations to set USB height. However, some owners like using the calculations and/or do not want to invest in the KS-123.
Sharpen the knife blade
Hone edge until perfection
Cut with joy and ease

Ken S

I met with the team who designed the KS-123 before it was released. I was and still am impressed with it. I was surprised when I learned the final price, $50US at the time.That's a lot of technology for that price.

It's just my opinion; however, At least for me, the KS-123 does everything I need. When used with the KJ-45 it makes my several SVM jigs unnecessary. For those who prefer the calculator apps, they still work as well as ever.

Ken

ABall

Thanks for the reply John, Ken. I did wonder if cost was a factor. I agree with you Ken, when i saw the new jig pop up on my feed I ordered it in a heart beat, I absolutely love it. I think I got a bit tired of the whole software/measuring thing and the jig has renewed my interest in using the Tormek again, so much so I just invested in a PT-50A, which has brought me back to the forum but thats for another thread.

RichColvin

I find the KS-123 incredibly easy to use and quite convenient.  I used it just this past week when sharpening which required switching between an SG-250 grindstone and an SJ-250 Japanese waterstone. 
---------------------------
Rich Colvin
www.SharpeningHandbook.info - a reference guide for sharpening

You are born weak & frail, and you die weak & frail.  What you do between those is up to you.

ABall

Quote from: RichColvin on July 21, 2025, 05:34:43 AMI find the KS-123 incredibly easy to use and quite convenient.  I used it just this past week when sharpening which required switching between an SG-250 grindstone and an SJ-250 Japanese waterstone.

My vernier calipers are packed away, I no longer see a need to use software.

Ken S

Watching the videos promoting the use ofcalculating programs, I have not seen any which show what I consider the practical use of these programs. For example: during a typical sharpening session with a dozen assorted knives, how many knives would need to be calculated? I used three preset jigs for different width knives, relying on the flexibility of depth in the jig for minor adjustments.

Even using just one jig, of the theoretical dozen knives, perhapsfour of them might be chef's knives with a similar width. Given the depth flexibility of the jig, calculating just one of these four knives should be sufficient. Also, this calculation should work for future knives of this width range. Ihave never seen this mentioned in program promoting videos. I am not criticizing the programs themselves, only what I consider their time increasing overuse.

I have standardized my knife sharpening at 15° per side and one pencil mark. For those who want more choices in bevel angles, it is a simple matterto find the correction using Dutchman's tables or any of the programs to mark a second or third pencil line.

I am not criticizing the programs. I am merely criticizing over reliance on them.

Ken