News:

Welcome to the Tormek Community. If you previously registered for the discussion board but had not made any posts, your membership may have been purged. Secure your membership in this community by joining in the conversations.
www.tormek.com

Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - pnwPat

#1
I can now contribute some additional info to the "perpetual" honing/stropping wheel maintenance question.

Per my earlier post, the leather on my honing wheel had acquired an excess of paste and oil that made honing difficult – to the point where the grit in the Tormek compound was probably mostly rolling and doing little cutting.

With the goal of correcting this (without buying a new honing wheel if possible), I started by scraping off the surface gunk with the wheel mounted and operating. I initially used as a scraper one of those semi-rectangular flexible plastic trowels typically used to apply Bondo. This got a fair bit off but left something to be desired. The edge of the plastic quickly wore down, and with any pressure the bead or ribbon of oil/gunk that was forming on the edge would get rolled back off and either re-absorbed in the leather or re-distributed on the wheel. I switched to a steel cabinet scraper (dull, with no "hook") which did much better, but I still had to frequently wipe it off to make progress. It worked best to hold the scraper almost perpendicular, tilting it about 5 or 10 degrees in the plane of the wheel (think of that tilt as a negative rake angle). This kept the scraper from "grabbing" or gouging the rotating leather while also minimizing the risk of lifting the leather at the lapped splice where the strip is joined. It also helped to slant the scraper maybe 20 degrees left or right to sort of funnel the remaining oil to and off the side of the wheel. Light pressure is not effective. I was able to use moderate pressure with reasonable success and no damage occurring, but decided not to try heavy pressure. 

Overall I removed maybe an ounce (~30 ml) of oil/sludge by scraping. I could have stopped there and had a functioning hone, and this is what I would recommend for others with the same problem. But I didn't stop, and that's why I can offer a bit more info here for the benefit of anyone interested.

Basically I decided to see if I could get all (or as much as possible) of the oil out of the leather, and then start over with something closer to the factory recommended amount of "pre-charge" oil (not sure exactly what the ideal is, but the amount of oil currently provided with newly purchased machines is reportedly about 3/4 oz, so I planned to start small and creep up with that as a limit).

For "de-oiling", earlier posts on this forum had various suggestions in addition to scraping, including: burying the wheel in sawdust; wrapping the leather in an old T-shirt or rag; using solvent; washing with soap and a brush; or running it through a dishwasher.

I was uncertain about using sawdust (could be difficult to clean afterwards) or solvent, so ruled them out.

I first tried wrapping a rag around the wheel, dismounted. This may have worked better with a band clamp, and regular changes of the rag, and giving it more time, but I just did a simple wrap and rolled the wheel about on my workbench with downward pressure. The rag soaked up some oil, evidenced by stains, but not very much. I moved on to washing with soap and a brush, under water. This got the surface film off,  but I did not think it was really effective in getting out the deeper oil. Finally, since at least one brave worker previously reported success with a dishwasher, I decided to try that. I also included the larger ring from the LA-120 Profile Hone (which was saturated with oil too) in that dishwasher cycle.

Before you ask, yes, I did have to get approval from the distaff side, but be aware our dishwasher is 12 years old. It still functions fine, but from her perspective any problem resulting from this experiment would mean replacing the dishwasher with a new one, a not altogether disagreeable prospect for her. I was willing to risk it, but your mileage may vary :)!

I can't say the dishwasher was a terrific success, but it was not a total failure either. What happened is that:

•   The dishwasher itself survived fine, no residual black sludge or oil, so dodged that bullet!

For the standard honing wheel:

•   The oil was pretty much gone. The leather was still black, but whatever residual oil remained was small enough that there was no suppleness left. Restating this another way, after drying for a full day the washed leather became nearly rock hard!
•   The glue bond holding the leather on the wheel survived - no leather appeared lifted from the wheel (although see below)
•   The dried leather ended up with raised humps at the edges all around the circumference – i.e. laying a straightedge across the width of the wheel, the center appeared dished, all the way around, by maybe 1 mm. The width of these "humps" was maybe 3 to 4 mm. Not sure why this effect appeared, perhaps the glue was starting to let go at the edges. Perhaps it was due to my initial scraping technique. Regardless, only limited additional work was needed to fix these bumps.
•   The overall dried leather surface was very rough – similar to the surface roughness of perhaps 40 grit sandpaper, but of course without sandpaper's durability.

For the profile honing ring:

•   Failed! Unfortunately the leather forming this ring was laminated from two layers glued together. The glue did not survive the dishwasher – the ring fully separated.  Re-gluing the warped pieces together again after drying did not look promising, so I ended up buying a replacement set of rings (part LA-122). Lesson learned. Brief water exposure is probably OK but long exposure of LA-120 profile hones to water is a bad idea!

Post dishwasher (once the standard honing wheel was fully dry):

I used sandpaper (starting at 60 and progressing to 120 grit) to smooth off the roughness and flatten the worst of the raised edges. Halfway through it occurred to me this was probably a bad idea – bits of grit from the sandpaper could break off and embed in the leather, compromising later fine honing. So I switched to a cabinet scraper with a sharpened hook to finish the job. This scraper worked surprisingly well to flatten the hardened leather without digging in or removing excess material. I lost perhaps 10 to 15 thousandths of the leather thickness, but there is still plenty left. I suspect I also removed any sandpaper grit that may have been left, as later on I didn't see any scratches that would indicate otherwise.

After scraping I had a flat and relatively smooth, but still very hard leather hone. I started adding clean mineral oil to "pre-charge" and also to soften the leather, but no more than absolutely necessary. The hard black surface did not absorb oil quickly so I applied it in small increments, 1 to 2 ml at a time, spreading that evenly around the wheel with a finger, rubbing it in a bit then just letting it sit for an hour or so. I repeated this just until I could leave a fingernail impression without using a lot of pressure. In total I applied about 10 ml (1/3 oz) of oil before that point was reached. This may or may not be a useful comparative benchmark against a new wheel, due to the different conditions of each, but at least the amount I needed for my wheel is documented here. After the final application of oil was fully absorbed I applied a thin uniform coat of honing compound. This was worked in by polishing the back of a 1" wide bench chisel (any flat surface would do) using very hard pressure. This also served to massage and soften the leather a bit.
 
No doubt the leather will soften up further with both regular working and applications of compound, but for now my "processed" hone is still much harder/stiffer than the original leather. I think it behaves more like a relatively soft wood hone, rather than leather, at the moment. This may be advantageous in some ways – but I need to do more observing and sharpening of various tools before deciding. Anyway, for me it will always be a subjective comparison since I don't have  measurement tools to objectively quantify the precise sharpness achieved after honing, nor at this point do I have a "standard" hone to compare against my "processed" hone. But FWIW I think "as is" it can produce equivalently sharp edges in maybe half to a third of the time I had been spending per edge back when the hone was over oiled, so I don't see any immediate need to replace this hone.

Bottom line, would I recommend washing an over-oiled hone/stropping wheel? Not at all, at least not unless something down the road convinces me that a harder hone is really superior, but even then I can't see a big consumer rush on this. If beneficial Tormek should just develop and market a hard honing wheel, maybe as an option, to supplement their standard offering.

What I would recommend without hesitation is that someone with excess oil in their otherwise fine Tormek honing wheel should try removing the excess using only a stiff scraper. Once the majority of the oil has been removed, continue normal honing, add no additional oil, just add compound when needed.

Of course, if feeling flush a quick (or lazy) solution is to buy a replacement honing wheel – but (at least for hobbyists) where's the fun in that :)?

Pat
#2
Thanks for the feedback.

I should have made it clearer that the idea applied solely to a low rotational speed environment. Wheel failure (for any cause) should be a relatively "low drama" event in that environment. The specific catalyst for the idea was limited availability of 2" wide Tormek compatible aggressive grinding wheels.

For dry grinders things are completely different. Wheel failure at those speeds would be catastrophic and potentially life threatening. Ganged wheels probably have more risk of damaging contact due to vibrations at speed. The nail in the coffin is that there are more wheel choices available for dry grinders, so the original idea catalyst doesn't apply in that environment.

Even for the Tormek the bottom line is that ganged wheels are just an interesting thought with inherently limited value and appeal. No matter if this might work under specific conditions with very important reservations and caveats, the ability of humans to predictably do things improperly or carelessly means that it can't really be endorsed. Certainly OSHA and/or manufacturers will never approve, I think. I also suspect over time any perceived advantage will probably evaporate as CBN wheel production matures.
#3
In reading prior posts I saw that the use of 8" Norton 3X grinding wheels on a Tormek to improve grinding efficiency (especially over SG or SB wheels) while retaining the advantages of wet grinding has been discussed in this forum under different topics. Ken did some testing and reported that the advantage was real and worth considering when heavy grinding is needed.

One 3x wheel disadvantage mentioned is the maximum size suitable for the Tormek: just 8" dia by 1" wide. For my own preference, if the need arose, I'd be inclined live with this, or if feeling particularly flush I might consider an 8" dia CBN wheel at roughly triple the price for a supposedly more durable 1.5" wide wheel.

However, it occurred to me that if a 2" wide wheel that can do efficient wet rough grinding was wanted at only twice the price, how about pairing identical 3x wheels side by side? If one of the inside paper blotters were removed first then I would guess the assembly could be "trued" after mounting such that the remaining gap would not materially affect the rough grinding operation. Slight imperfections in the trueness of the assembly should not matter at that stage. As Ken previously mentioned, final sharpening after rough shaping should be done on SG or SB wheels, which can be perfectly trued.

Are there any technical reasons that a 2" wide paired 3X wheel approach would not work? Ken, will two 3x wheels fit on a current Tormek shaft with threads still available for the Ezlock nut to grab? There is probably some risk that if one or both of the adjacent 3x wheel sides were not flat enough, compressing them together might fracture one. I've no experience with that, but wouldn't the remaining paper blotter between the paired wheels provide enough cushion to prevent cracking without the resultant gap causing any serious functional loss?

Might be a crazy idea, but still food for thought. Someone please set me straight if I've overlooked something obvious.
#4
Elden,

Nicely done! I'm still browsing through old threads and hadn't seen that one yet, but your Tormek workstation is an impressive combination of portable functional ergonomic design, going far beyond just a swivel base! It's fun to see creative solutions like that - and this forum is a great vehicle for disseminating such design ideas. Bits (or all) of such ideas may eventually serve as further inspiration, so kudos and appreciation to everyone who make it happen!
#5
I saw your preference for that in the thread, Ken, and agree it is a very slick solution if you have the right workstation. Unfortunately my present workbench is too wide for that to work well (I'd be bending forward too much for comfort on one side or the other, or both, while working, and that's even if it wasn't cluttered with project components or tools :)). Right now I normally use a countertop that is installed against a wall, but like I said, maybe some day I'll get fancy and build a stand alone or peninsula type workstation specifically for sharpening that can support your suggestion.

Cheers,

Pat
#6
For rotating a Tormek (at the risk of appearing gauche by suggesting a potentially "less pricey" solution than an official Tormek base, perish the thought! :)), why not place a suitable tray (such as the ones mentioned in this thread) on top of a swivel base, such as from Lee Valley's Home & Garden section: http://www.leevalley.com/en/wood/page.aspx?p=48644&cat=1,250,43298,43316. The 16" size is $21.50 US. It is plastic and thus water proof, or at least resistant, presumably. The load capacity is 200 lbs, plenty for this application. Both the tray and machine sitting on this would easily rotate together, when desired.

You'd still need to fashion a latch or brake for the selected working position, but one way would be to use a board under the tray (to ensure lack of flexing), and a board under the swivel (to make the whole setup portable), then simply extend such boards on the sides an inch or so and drop a bolt (or two) through drilled holes that align when the machine is in position. Double stick tape could ensure the swivel base stayed put between the boards, forming an intact assembly that can be moved or stored. Voila!

Personally I have always just lifted the machine and set it down the other way, working on a formica work surface that I just let get wet and wipe up afterwards, but maybe some year I'll get fancy...

Pat
#7
Hello,

I'm new to this forum, and have been browsing off and on for the last couple of days. Lots of useful information has been archived here - most appreciated. Even if not always ideally organized, the major categories help, and there is always search!

Background: I have had a SuperGrind 2000 for over 10 years, used undoubtedly fairly lightly compared to most users here (diameter of original wheel is now still 240 mm!), but I do intermittently sharpen, mostly kitchen knives, bench chisels, and planer blades. I am reasonably proficient but by no means an expert. Still, it is really enjoyable when a really sharp edge emerges, so even if it takes me relatively long (or even several re-starts) to get there, I persist and enjoy the process. Must admit, it got easier after retirement when I had more time to spend :).

I recently decided to take the plunge and add the capability to do drill bits. I am mostly looking for quality of bit edges, because buying new standard bits would certainly be much cheaper! :). The posts within the Drill Bit Sharpening section were most applicable and very illuminating. I've ordered the desired parts and am looking forward to receiving them soon, including the stainless shaft upgrade, an SB-250 wheel, the DBS-22 jig, and some miscellany.

With that said, my original manual has been my guide since purchase (ver 7.1). Page 128 of that manual says a honing compound application lasts for 5 to 10 tools (optimistic, in my experience); then (quote) "Then re-impregnate the honing wheel with a few drops of oil and apply fresh honing compound. ... Do not let the compound dry, apply more oil if necessary."

Wish I'd discovered this forum earlier. Silly me, following the manual's advice over the years I'd say my strop is no longer impregnated, but closer to saturated! Each time I fired up the SG2000 the wheel would seem dry. I'd add a few drops of oil, then honing compound, then (if there were many knives or chisels to do) more oil, etc.

So my question seems to fit this thread best, namely, what to do about a honing wheel that has been over oiled? Can the leather be rejuvenated if the leather itself is in good shape, with no gouges or rips, or should it just be replaced? One  suggestion earlier in this thread included "scraping" the old oil out. perhaps with a cabinet scraper? Or just a strip of wood that has been square cut?). Another suggestion said to use sandpaper (but I think this would end up a gummy mess with the current condition of my leather). Has anyone tried solvent (gas or acetone, perhaps, with adequate precautions for such highly flammable solvents) to clear out excess oil and start over?

Thanks,

Pat